With biotechnology in our midst, the legal definition of what it means to be human is being called into question. What is the criteria we can use determine what is human and what is not? In this article by Bartha Maria Knoppers and Henry Greely for the Science journal looks at genetic identity, species identity, neuro identity, and the cells and tissues as the common basis for “humanness”. They also discuss how each of these criteria is currently being questioned by biotechnology, and offers ways to move forward.
With neuroenhancements and artificial general intelligence almost at our door, discussions like this will become ever more important. It is a testament to the eroding “specialness” of the human being when viewed through a materialist perspective, and a proof of the wide implications of the findings of consciousness studies, neuroscience, and other new sciences.
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the original article offline.
You may also like
-
Nuclear Power Is Not For Human Societies, It Is For AI
-
Is there hope for an ethical AI?
-
Elon Musk warned of a ‘Terminator’-like AI apocalypse — now he has built a robot
-
Hundreds of Google DeepMind Employees Urge Company to Stop Military Contracts
-
Yuval Harari Warns: Never Summon a Power You Can’t Control