In 2009, Daniele Fanelli wrote a meta-analysis of various researches which aimed to measure the prevalence of scientific misconduct among researchers. Her results are astounding. Up to 33.7% of respondents admitted that they used questionable research practices, while up to 72% said that their colleagues engage in scientific misconduct. Fanelli notes that most surveys included in the meta analysis asked sensitive questions, and there is a huge possibility that these statistics are conservative estimates.
Read Original Article
![](https://fully-human.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/fantasy-2861107_640.jpg)
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
![](https://fully-human.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/fantasy-2861107_640.jpg)
![](https://fully-human.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/fantasy-2861107_640.jpg)
![](https://fully-human.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/fantasy-2861107_640.jpg)
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the original article offline.